Postal Dispute

Then in 2007 the government announced it was seeking a 'strategic partner', confirming what everyone suspected. Costs were being reduced to make Royal Mail attractive for privatisation. We staff were given 'shares' in the company. Even though Royal Mail is state owned! I now 'own' shares in Royal Mail, even though you and I (the public) own the company. 

The bulk of our work is delivering catalogues, magazines and what most people regard as junk mail, in addition to mail from utility companies, banks, and of course the government. Some of these companies may now choose to have their mail sorted and processed by other operators like TNT or DHL, but Royal Mail then delivers it.  These companies, the Down Stream Access companies (DSAs) are now Royal Mail's customers, along with the bulk mailers. Not you and I, the people who buy stamps to send letters or bill payments. So when they talk about disrupting customers they don't mean you. This is not a public service any more.

Broken agreement

The current dispute is a direct result of Royal Mail's refusal to keep to the agreement made with the union in 2007. Once Royal Mail got what they wanted - job losses, cuts and imposed changes to working conditions, they walked away. 

The postal strike interim agreement between the Communication Workers Union (CWU) and Royal Mail contains a number of concessions forced out of the bosses.

These are a result of the national strike action taken over five days and before that hundreds of local strikes. The calling off of the strike at the last minute led to confusion and questioning amongst ordinary CWU members.

The news broke on the Thursday evening, just hours before the third wave of national strikes were due to take place. There was anger amongst many postal workers who were preparing to go to the picket lines on the Friday and the following Monday. There was also confusion because they couldn't understand why the leadership called the strike off when it was clear that the bosses were stunned by the level of support the strike had gained, including from a majority in opinion polls.

Many workers wondered what could be in the agreement that warranted the strike being postponed.

TUC secretary Brendan Barber said on the steps of Congress House that the "interim" deal guaranteed a period of calm up to Christmas. This added to the general bewilderment of all those who were thinking that the strike had been called off just at a time when postal workers had never been stronger.

Back to the table

But once they had a chance of looking at what was achieved by their mass strike action, many of the workers have drawn the conclusion that the deal (unanimously agreed it seems by the elected postal executive committee) does allow the CWU to regain some element of trade union control in the workplace and therefore does push back the attacks of the bosses.

One local CWU leader in the South West wrote to his members: "We have forced a vicious employer back to the table". He went on to say: "We know the interim deal does not settle every single problem in the industry but it gives us a foothold ... Royal Mail set out to destroy your union. We are still here".

The idea, often put forward in the right-wing media, that workers are ready to strike at the drop of a hat is wrong. In this case many think the interim deal opens the way to the reversal of the attacks on them and their union.

Workloads

Workloads and other working conditions will once more be subject to negotiation rather than be imposed on the workers with the union shut out of the process.

In a number of places in the wording of the interim agreement the words mutuality or mutual agreement are used. This suggests that the union in the final agreement will, if not have a veto, at least be part of the process of any future changes, which themselves will be subject to agreement before they take place.

This issue of trade union 'control' is important. It lies at the heart of the battle in the postal workplace. It means the difference between the workers having some form of protection against a bullying management and none at all.

The Royal Mail bosses in the period leading up to the national strikes had launched a wholesale attack on the CWU. They sought to impose changes by ignoring the union and its local workplace reps. They went even further when they withdrew facility time for the reps and were well on the way to reducing the union to the bare legal minimum of facilities, forcing the reps back onto the job and allowing them no time to represent their members on day to day issues. It is written in clear language in the interim agreement that facility time will be reinstated to its previous level. The implementation of this will be a victory for the CWU and its members.

The start of the national strike stopped the bosses in their tracks and there was a palpable raising of the heads of the union activists in the days they were back at work in between the strikes. The action has shaken the management, at least at the top, including Lord Mandelson who has been notably quiet of late about the dispute.

However, if the national agreement comes to be seen as no more than a paper exercise then no doubt there will be pressure from the union branches and members to reinstate the national action. Also, local managers might take some time to take on board that there has been a shift in the balance of forces back to the workers and their union and the chances are that there will probably be more local walkouts as a result.

What would have happened if the strikes had not been called off, is something that can be argued about. Perhaps with the boot of the workers on the throat of the bosses then more concessions could and would have been made.

The job of leadership is to know when to advance and when to retreat. In the postal workers' case it was clear that it was the bosses who were in retreat. But also what has to be taken into account is the readiness of your own troops to continue to advance as well. Many postal workers were looking to Christmas as time to be with their families and to have a well earned rest.

Overtime

It was no accident that one of the bottom lines laid down by the postal executive committee for any agreement was the ability to work overtime again. This had been removed when Royal Mail had announced the hiring of 30,000 temporary workers. Not only were these workers being brought in to undermine the strike but also to eliminate the need for any overtime in the busiest time of the year for Royal Mail. Overtime is seen by postal workers as a necessary evil to boost their low pay. Normally around 15,000 extra staff are taken on for the Christmas rush and postal workers are also required to do overtime.

The interim deal gives back this ability to work overtime and also brings back into the office of origin any post that was diverted during the strike, especially from the more militant mail centres and delivery offices. Some was diverted to special centres staffed by agency workers such as Dartford in Kent. Plans to organise demonstrations outside some of these offices added to the pressure on the bosses to make concessions.

Other issues

There are a number of other issues dealt with, including a 'no victimisation' clause and reference to reviewing changes and in some cases renegotiating them in workplaces where they have already been imposed.

In London, 147 workplaces were or are in the process of being balloted for strike action against imposed changes, which may now be subject to renegotiation. London workers and some other areas have lost 18 days in strike action, a loss of around £2,000 per worker. Without national strike action these concessions would not have been made.

Under the interim deal there will be a review of progress every two weeks and at the same time national and local strike ballots will remain active. Postal workers will be watching the progress of these talks carefully and they will expect their leaders to reinstate the strike if it is clear that Royal Mail are deliberately dragging things out until they have got Christmas out of the way.

The national strikes were also a blow to the plans of New Labour to clear the way for wholesale privatisation.

Postal dispute: Bosses still on the attack

The London divisional committee of the postal workers' union, CWU, have unanimously voted to call on the CWU's national postal executive to reinstate the national strike.

The regional committee says that after some six meetings with London Royal Mail, management is still refusing to honour the full terms of the interim agreement. The committee adds: "All they want to do is make more cuts and introduce 'absorption' without re-engaging about the changes they have already imposed with regard to job cuts, revisions, part-timers, belated hours, rest day hours, four-day weeks etc in line with the agreement... This is a national agreement they're breaking, it's a national union, therefore it requires national action".

The call for the reinstatement of the national strikes seems to have come from London only at this moment. It is clear that in London at least the bosses are playing hard ball. The strikes were called off to allow national and local talks to take place with the idea, as far as the union was concerned, to look again where changes had been imposed by management without agreement and to renegotiate these changes.  For most postal workers, the calling off of the planned strikes on the basis of the interim agreement (even if all its nuances were not clear) meant that they could take a breather from the action and see what came out of the talks. Some were disappointed and had grave doubts that these talks would get anywhere of substance.

The Socialist Party's workplace bulletin at the time argued that: "The agreement provides a framework, but only if local managements reinstate discussions and negotiations to reverse un-agreed practices. "Any indication from local offices that managers are refusing to adhere to the agreement, remove un-agreed practices and introduce realistic workloads and attendances must be met with an immediate reinstatement of the action by our leadership."

What is clear is that in London the battle has gone much further than most areas of the country. There have been 139 live strike ballots since the summer. 400 workplaces in the capital are affected, involving tens of thousands of postal workers. Some of them have lost up to 23 days pay to strike action, with the average being 18 days. London postal workers have lost some £2,000 in wages.  The postal executive has a responsibility to listen to the demands of their London members and give notice of the union's intent to reinstate the national strikes.

No doubt this will not be supported by Brendan Barber of the TUC who brokered the deal and claimed that it would mean peace up to Christmas. But the bosses are playing fast and loose, with the national bosses giving the London management the nod and the wink to put the boot in.  An announcement by the national leadership to reinstate the strikes will concentrate the minds of Royal Mail management like nothing else. If the workers are forced to go on strike again then the union leadership must call upon the whole of the trade union movement to come to their aid. The setting up of cross union solidarity committees at regional level; as has been done in London, will demonstrate the union's intent to force the hand of the bosses.

Solidarity action from other sectors can range from joint meetings, financial support, and organised demos to direct industrial action, in particular in those parts of the public sector which are also facing cuts.  The union executive are assessing the progress, or lack of it, as this article is written, but many workers think there is a chronic shortage of information about the deal and what has happened since. This means many union members fear that there could be a demobilisation of the union in the midst of this battle.